1. Beschaffer
1.1.
Beschaffer
Offizielle Bezeichnung: Amprion GmbH
Rechtsform des Erwerbers: Organisation mit besonderen oder ausschließlichen Rechten
Tätigkeit des Auftraggebers: Mit Strom zusammenhängende Tätigkeiten
2. Verfahren
2.1.
Verfahren
Titel: MARI-Testing Services
Beschreibung: Manually Activated Reserves Initiative (MARI) is the European implementation project for the creation of the European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with manual activation (mFRR). The Electricity Balancing guideline (Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2195) (hereinafter the ‘EB Regulation‘), approved by the Electricity Cross-Border Committee on 16 March 2017, defines tasks and a timeline for the implementation of the European mFRR platform. The tendered Testing Service provider is responsible for testing the software developed for MARI and the connections between TSOs and the MARI platform. Furthermore Testing Service provider supports TSOs with their accession to MARI platform.
Kennung des Verfahrens: 5fcc5cfd-af9a-4e86-affc-21d5dbc025b6
Interne Kennung: MARI-Testing Services
Verfahrensart: Verhandlungsverfahren mit vorheriger Veröffentlichung eines Aufrufs zum Wettbewerb/Verhandlungsverfahren
Das Verfahren wird beschleunigt: nein
2.1.1.
Zweck
Art des Auftrags: Dienstleistungen
Haupteinstufung (cpv): 72000000 IT-Dienste: Beratung, Software-Entwicklung, Internet und Hilfestellung
2.1.2.
Erfüllungsort
Postanschrift: Von-Werth-Straße 274
Stadt: Pulheim
Postleitzahl: 50259
Land, Gliederung (NUTS): Rhein-Erft-Kreis (DEA27)
Land: Deutschland
2.1.4.
Allgemeine Informationen
Der Aufruf zum Wettbewerb ist beendet
Zusätzliche Informationen: The contracting authority Amprion GmbH is neither a contracting authority within the meaning of § 99 GWB nor a utility company within the meaning of § 100 GWB. It therefore does not have to apply the procurement law provisions of the GWB ( § 97 GWB et seq.) or the Sectoral Regulation (SektVO); see OLG Munich, decision of August 28, 2019 - Verg 15/19 and decision of March 9, 2020, Verg 27/19. In the present procurement procedure, Amprion is not procuring services exclusively for its own purposes, but also for the purposes of the other MARI project partners. As most of the MARI project partners are European TSOs and therefore contracting authorities or utilities, Amprion must apply the provisions of the GWB and the SektVO in this exceptional case. In principle, the required declarations/evidence must be submitted in German or English or in an officially certified translation. If a declaration/evidence cannot be submitted, the applicant must give reasons for this, provide a comparable declaration/evidence and explain - in German or English - why it is comparable.
Rechtsgrundlage:
Richtlinie 2014/25/EU
sektvo -
5. Los
5.1.
Los: LOT-0001
Titel: MARI - Testing Services
Beschreibung: The provider of this task will be responsible for planning and executing User Acceptance Testing (UAT), and for planning and facilitating interoperability testing between the MARI platform and external systems of the participating TSOs (IOP). Part of the preliminary phase will be to participate in Factory Acceptance Tests (FAT) which will be executed and facilitated by providers of software development Unicorn and Artelys. In cooperation with the project, the UAT phase needs to be planned: test cases, test scenarios, expected performance and benchmarking against mFRR platform requirements catalogue in its most current version. During the UAT, the provider must be in a position to carry out these tests, mostly independently (possibly with the involvement of Unicorn), and report to the project on the results, issues encountered and possible counter-measures on a regular basis determined by the project. A final test report is expected, so that the project can assess the results of the developed version and decide on next steps (exit criteria).
Interne Kennung: MARI-Testing Services
5.1.1.
Zweck
Art des Auftrags: Dienstleistungen
Haupteinstufung (cpv): 72000000 IT-Dienste: Beratung, Software-Entwicklung, Internet und Hilfestellung
Optionen:
Beschreibung der Optionen: 2 x 24 months each
5.1.2.
Erfüllungsort
Postanschrift: Von-Werth-Straße 274
Stadt: Pulheim
Postleitzahl: 50259
Land, Gliederung (NUTS): Rhein-Erft-Kreis (DEA27)
Land: Deutschland
5.1.3.
Geschätzte Dauer
Laufzeit: 48 Monate
5.1.4.
Verlängerung
Maximale Verlängerungen: 2
5.1.6.
Allgemeine Informationen
Die Beschaffung fällt unter das Übereinkommen über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen: ja
5.1.7.
Strategische Auftragsvergabe
Ziel der strategischen Auftragsvergabe: Keine strategische Beschaffung
5.1.10.
Zuschlagskriterien
Kriterium:
Art: Preis
Bezeichnung: Price
Beschreibung: A maximum of 30.00 (thirty) points can be awarded for this award criterion. The bidder with the best price will receive the full number of points. The points for the prices for the other bids will be set in relation to the best price.
Gewichtung (Punkte, genau): 30
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Project concept
Beschreibung: A maximum of 25 (twenty five) points can be achieved. Points for this sub-criterion are awarded on the basis of a plausibility and quality check of the concept to be submitted. For the sake of clarity, the project concept can be submitted within a dedicated file (PDF). The concept must contain the following requirements in particular, but not exclusively: Project organization (resource planning, ability to process parallel workstreams) Identification of focal points and time risks in the project Identification of communication interfaces in the project Execution concept that reflects the total effort for this project. This should show the number of hours per project member envisaged by the tenderer (based on the qualifications contained in the price list). Handover and familiarization with the project (schedule, risk management, resource planning...)
Gewichtung (Punkte, genau): 25
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: MARI Requirements Catalogue
Beschreibung: A maximum of 20.0 (twenty) points can be achieved. Points are awarded for the criterion as a result of a plausibility and quality check of the requirements catalogue completed by the tenderer. For each listed requirement (Req.ID), the tenderer must explain whether and how it will implement the requirement. The description should contain details of the specific implementation by the tenderer. The contracting authority shall evaluate the tenderers' explanations using the points system below. 0= Notor marginally fulfilled 1= Partially fulfilled 2= Largely or completely fulfilled
Gewichtung (Punkte, genau): 20
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Guideline ISMS service provider
Beschreibung: The tenderer must prepare a qualified self-disclosure on the implementation of the security requirements by writing a self disclosure in the field provided for this purpose in the document ( 10 Richtlinie ISMS Dienstleister im Prozessbereich_ENGLISCH.xslx). In addition to simply stating whether the security requirements are met, the method of implementation must also be briefly described. The contracting authority shall assess the information in the tenderer's offer for each security requirement of the Guideline ISMS with 0 to 2 points. 0= Not or marginally fulfilled 1= Partially fulfilled 2= Largely or completely fulfilled 0= Not or marginally fulfilled: The response does not answer the question, has completely skipped the question or only gives a very limited substantive answer to the requested elements. 1= Partially fulfilled: The response has a limited substantive relevance to the requested elements and aspects, but has sufficiently taken into account the principles of this tender and is sufficiently in line with the requirements. 2= Largely or completely fulfilled: the description concerns a substantively relevant and applicable or even excellent answer based on the principles of this tender. All requested elements have been at least well developed and answered, with mostly substantive specific relevant details or details that correspond at least largely to the requested elements.
Gewichtung (Punkte, genau): 15
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Sample Test Report
Beschreibung: A maximum of 10.0 (ten) points can be achieved. Points for this sub-criterion are awarded on the basis of a plausibility and quality check of the sample test report to be submitted. The sample test report shall be submitted within a dedicated file (PDF). Comments and explanations to the Sample Testreport may be made in the Evaluation Tendering Supplier Form (2.4. Sample Testreport). The contractor must submit an example of a test report that takes into account the following aspects, among others: - Structure of the test report/structure - Presentation of the test process - Essential contents The bidder can achieve a maximum of three (3) points for each of the three (3) requirements above for a total of nine (9) points. An additional one (1) point can be achieved, if the example to be submitted does not exceed 9000 characters (approximately 5 DIN A4 pages). The contracting authority will evaluate this sub-criterion as part of an overall assessment using the points system below. Within the margin of discretion available to the contracting authority the distribution of points is based on the following assessment scheme: 0= not fulfilled 1= partially fulfilled 2= mainly fulfilled 3= completely fulfilled 0= not fulfilled: The response does not answer the question, has completely skipped the question or only gives a very limited substantive answer to the requested elements. 1= partially fulfilled: The response has a limited substantive relevance to the requested elements and aspects but has sufficiently taken into account the principles of this tender and is sufficiently in line with the requirements. 2= mainly fulfilled: the description concerns a substantively relevant and applicable answer based on the principles of this tender. All requested elements have been at least well developed and answered, with mostly substantive specific relevant details or details that correspond at least largely to the requested elements. 3= completely fulfilled: the description concerns an excellent answer based on the principles of this tender. All requested elements have been well developed and answered, with substantive specific relevant details or details that correspond to the requested elements.
Gewichtung (Punkte, genau): 10
5.1.12.
Bedingungen für die Auftragsvergabe
Informationen über die Überprüfungsfristen: An application for review is inadmissible if more than 15 calendar days have elapsed since receipt of the notification by the contracting authority that it does not intend to remedy a complaint ( § 160 (3) sentence 1, no. 4 GWB). An application for review is also inadmissible if the application is only served after the contract has been awarded (§ 168 (2) sentence 1 GWB). The award of the contract is possible 10 days after the announcement of the award decision has been sent by fax or electronically or 15 days after the announcement of the award decision has been sent by post ( § 134 (2) GWB). The admissibility of an application for review also requires that the alleged breaches of contract award rules have been notified within 10 calendar days of becoming known or - if the breaches of contract award rules are recognizable from the contract notice or the award documents - by the end of the participation or tender period ( § 160 (3) sentence 1 no. 1-3 GWB).
5.1.15.
Techniken
Rahmenvereinbarung: Rahmenvereinbarung ohne erneuten Aufruf zum Wettbewerb
Informationen über das dynamische Beschaffungssystem: Kein dynamisches Beschaffungssystem
Elektronische Auktion: nein
5.1.16.
Weitere Informationen, Schlichtung und Nachprüfung
Überprüfungsstelle: Geschäftsstelle der Vergabekammer
Organisation, die zusätzliche Informationen über das Vergabeverfahren bereitstellt: Geschäftsstelle der Vergabekammer
Organisation, die einen Offline-Zugang zu den Vergabeunterlagen bereitstellt: Amprion GmbH
Organisation, die weitere Informationen für die Nachprüfungsverfahren bereitstellt: Geschäftsstelle der Vergabekammer
Organisation, die den Auftrag unterzeichnet: Amprion GmbH
TED eSender: Datenservice Öffentlicher Einkauf (in Verantwortung des Beschaffungsamts des BMI)
6. Ergebnisse
Höchstwert der Rahmenvereinbarungen in diesem Verfahren: 8 000 000,00 EUR
6.1.
Ergebnis, Los-– Kennung: LOT-0001
Status der Preisträgerauswahl: Es wurde mindestens ein Gewinner ermittelt.
Rahmenvereinbarung:
Höchstwert der Rahmenvereinbarung: 10 000 000,00 EUR
Neu geschätzter Wert der Rahmenvereinbarung: 6 462 000,00 EUR
6.1.4.
Statistische Informationen:
Eingegangene Angebote oder Teilnahmeanträge:
Art der eingegangenen Einreichungen: Angebote
Anzahl der eingegangenen Angebote oder Teilnahmeanträge: 5
Bandbreite der Angebote:
Wert des niedrigsten zulässigen Angebots: 6 462 000,00 EUR
Wert des höchsten zulässigen Angebots: 19 957 760,00 EUR
8. Organisationen
8.1.
ORG-0001
Offizielle Bezeichnung: Amprion GmbH
Registrierungsnummer: DE813761356
Abteilung: E-SI
Postanschrift: Robert-Schuman-Straße 7
Stadt: Dortmund
Postleitzahl: 44263
Land, Gliederung (NUTS): Dortmund, Kreisfreie Stadt (DEA52)
Land: Deutschland
Kontaktperson: Strategic Procurement
Telefon: 000
Rollen dieser Organisation:
Beschaffer
Organisation, die einen Offline-Zugang zu den Vergabeunterlagen bereitstellt
Organisation, die den Auftrag unterzeichnet
8.1.
ORG-0002
Offizielle Bezeichnung: Geschäftsstelle der Vergabekammer
Registrierungsnummer: DE164242157
Postanschrift: Albrecht-Thaer-Straße 9
Stadt: Münster
Postleitzahl: 48147
Land, Gliederung (NUTS): Münster, Kreisfreie Stadt (DEA33)
Land: Deutschland
Kontaktperson: Strategic Procurement
Telefon: +49251 411-2165
Rollen dieser Organisation:
Organisation, die zusätzliche Informationen über das Vergabeverfahren bereitstellt
Überprüfungsstelle
Organisation, die weitere Informationen für die Nachprüfungsverfahren bereitstellt
8.1.
ORG-0003
Offizielle Bezeichnung: Accenture GmbH
Registrierungsnummer: DE 811 669 950
Postanschrift: Campus Kronberg
Stadt: Kronberg
Postleitzahl: 61476
Land, Gliederung (NUTS): Hochtaunuskreis (DE718)
Land: Deutschland
Telefon: 000
Rollen dieser Organisation:
8.1.
ORG-0004
Offizielle Bezeichnung: Datenservice Öffentlicher Einkauf (in Verantwortung des Beschaffungsamts des BMI)
Registrierungsnummer: 0204:994-DOEVD-83
Stadt: Bonn
Postleitzahl: 53119
Land, Gliederung (NUTS): Bonn, Kreisfreie Stadt (DEA22)
Land: Deutschland
Telefon: +49228996100
Rollen dieser Organisation:
TED eSender
11. Informationen zur Bekanntmachung
11.1.
Informationen zur Bekanntmachung
Kennung/Fassung der Bekanntmachung: 6147eb10-c569-4999-9cb0-f5732b2ef7f6 - 01
Formulartyp: Ergebnis
Art der Bekanntmachung: Bekanntmachung vergebener Aufträge oder Zuschlagsbekanntmachung – Standardregelung
Unterart der Bekanntmachung: 30
Datum der Übermittlung der Bekanntmachung: 07/08/2024 00:00:00 (UTC+2)
Sprachen, in denen diese Bekanntmachung offiziell verfügbar ist: Deutsch
11.2.
Informationen zur Veröffentlichung
Veröffentlichungsnummer der Bekanntmachung: 478017-2024
ABl. S – Nummer der Ausgabe: 154/2024
Datum der Veröffentlichung: 08/08/2024