Training Equipment and Tools for Refrigerant Recovery (Brazil) Referenznummer der Bekanntmachung: 7200074173
Bekanntmachung vergebener Aufträge
Ergebnisse des Vergabeverfahrens
Lieferauftrag
Abschnitt I: Öffentlicher Auftraggeber
Postanschrift:[gelöscht]
Ort: Eschborn
NUTS-Code: DE71A Main-Taunus-Kreis
Postleitzahl: 65760
Land: Deutschland
E-Mail: [gelöscht]
Telefon: +49 619679
Fax: [gelöscht]
Internet-Adresse(n):
Hauptadresse: https://www.giz.de
Abschnitt II: Gegenstand
Training Equipment and Tools for Refrigerant Recovery (Brazil)
Delivery of equipment and tools for training of technicians for RAC servicing, packed and marked according to the specificaton
Tools and Equipment for RAC Servicing
00000 Brazil
Delivery of equipment and tools for training of technicians for RAC servicing to be packed for five different delivery addresses (to be anounced before delivery, delivery by the bidder to FCA Hamburg Seaport). Therefore, bidders must make sure that the quantities for each destination are packed and marked separately for shipping.
Tools and Equipment for Brazing and Tubing
00000 Brazil
Delivery of equipment and tools for training of technicians for RAC servicing to be packed for five different delivery addresses (to be anounced before delivery, delivery by the bidder to FCA Hamburg Seaport). Therefore, bidders must make sure that the quantities for each destination are packed and marked separately for shipping.
Tools and Equipment for Electrical Works
00000 Brazil
Delivery of equipment and tools for training of technicians for RAC servicing to be packed for five different delivery addresses (to be anounced before delivery, delivery by the bidder to FCA Hamburg Seaport). Therefore, bidders must make sure that the quantities for each destination are packed and marked separately for shipping.
Abschnitt IV: Verfahren
Abschnitt V: Auftragsvergabe
Auftragsvergabe E. + E. Boss GmbH
Postanschrift:[gelöscht]
Ort: Albstadt
NUTS-Code: DE143 Zollernalbkreis
Postleitzahl: 72461
Land: Deutschland
E-Mail: [gelöscht]
Telefon: [gelöscht]
Fax: [gelöscht]
Internet-Adresse: http://www.eeboss.de
Abschnitt V: Auftragsvergabe
Auftragsvergabe E. + E. Boss GmbH
Postanschrift:[gelöscht]
Ort: Albstadt
NUTS-Code: DE143 Zollernalbkreis
Postleitzahl: 72461
Land: Deutschland
E-Mail: [gelöscht]
Telefon: [gelöscht]
Fax: [gelöscht]
Internet-Adresse: http://www.eeboss.de
Abschnitt V: Auftragsvergabe
Auftragsvergabe E. + E. Boss GmbH
Postanschrift:[gelöscht]
Ort: Albstadt
NUTS-Code: DE143 Zollernalbkreis
Postleitzahl: 72461
Land: Deutschland
E-Mail: [gelöscht]
Telefon: [gelöscht]
Fax: [gelöscht]
Internet-Adresse: http://www.eeboss.de
Abschnitt VI: Weitere Angaben
Bekanntmachungs-ID: CXTRYYRYRBS
Postanschrift:[gelöscht]
Ort: Bonn
Postleitzahl: 53123
Land: Deutschland
E-Mail: [gelöscht]
Telefon: [gelöscht]
Fax: [gelöscht]
Internet-Adresse: https://www.bundeskartellamt.de
According to Article 160, Section 3 of the German Act Against Restraint of Competition (GWB), application for review is not permissible insofar as
1. the applicant has identified the claimed infringement of the procurement rules before submitting the application for review and has not submitted a complaint to the contracting authority within a period of 10 calendar days; the expiry of the period pursuant to Article 134, Section 2 remains unaffected,
2. complaints of infringements of procurement rules that are evident in the tender notice are not submitted to the contracting authority at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for the application or by the deadline for the submission of bids, specified in the tender notice
3. complaints of infringements of procurement rules that first become evident in the tender documents are not submitted to the contracting authority at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for application or by the deadline for the submission of bids,
4. more than 15 calendar days have expired since receipt of notification from the contracting authority that it is unwilling to redress the complaint.
Sentence 1 does not apply in the case of an application to determine the invalidity of the contract in accordance with Article 135, Section 1 (2). Article 134, Section 1, Sentence 2 remains unaffected.