81272696-Macroeconomic Reform/ Green Growth Programme Referenznummer der Bekanntmachung: 81272696
Bekanntmachung vergebener Aufträge
Ergebnisse des Vergabeverfahrens
Dienstleistungen
Abschnitt I: Öffentlicher Auftraggeber
Postanschrift:[gelöscht]
Ort: Eschborn
NUTS-Code: DE71A Main-Taunus-Kreis
Postleitzahl: 65760
Land: Deutschland
Kontaktstelle(n):[gelöscht]
E-Mail: [gelöscht]
Telefon: [gelöscht]
Fax: [gelöscht]
Internet-Adresse(n):
Hauptadresse: https://www.giz.de
Abschnitt II: Gegenstand
81272696-Macroeconomic Reform/ Green Growth Programme
The "Macroeconomic Reform/ Green Growth Programme", commissioned by the German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and implemented by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), aims at supporting the Vietnamese government in increasing the coherence of Vietnam"s economic policy, including its green financial policy, green fiscal policy, and public financial management. The programme has been commissioned in 2018 and runs until December 2022. The total commissioning value amounts to [Betrag gelöscht] Euro. A replenishment and extension until 03/2026 is planned. Focusing on the macro level, the programme includes four components to support the transition towards a green, inclusive and sustainable growth model.
First, the programme supports the Ministry of Planning and Investment (MPI) in developing strategic policy documents, such as the Vietnam Green Growth Strategy, the Socio-Economic Development Plan, and the National Action Plan to implement the 2030 Agenda. To ensure effective monitoring, the programme furthermore supports the MPI and the General Statistics Office (GSO) in developing and integrating relevant indicators to measure the success of these planning documents. Second, the programme collaborates with the Central Institute for Economic Management (CIEM) under MPI in conducting relevant economic studies to facilitate evidence-based policy making on the political level. In that context, the programme analyses for instance the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the Vietnamese economy. Third, the programme supports the Ministry of Finance (MOF) to improve national budgeting, accounting for policy priorities in the area of sustainable public finance. Furthermore, the programme collaborates with MOF in the development and adjustment of tax instruments to incentivize investments in green technology. Finally, the programme cooperates with the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) to introduce policies to promote green finance and fintech, e. g. by advising in the development of the Digital Banking Strategy or preparing the emission of green bonds.
To ensure sustainability, the programme collaborates closely with national and subnational partner organizations, builds capacities on the individual, organizational, and societal level, and institutionalizes results by integrating them in national policies and regulations. By cooperating with different institutions within the Vietnamese government, the transition towards an economically, ecologically, and socially sustainable growth model can be addressed in a strategic and integrated manner. Furthermore, the programme is embedded in the cluster "Sustainable Economic Development" of GIZ in Vietnam, creating synergies e. g. with the GIZ-implemented programme "Social Dimensions of Green Growth" and "Strengthening the Legal Development Capacity of the Office of Government".
00000 Vietnam
Since the adoption of the SDGs in New York in 2015, the Vietnamese government has been actively working towards their implementation. The process is coordinated by the Department of Science, Education, National Resources and Environment at the Ministry of Planning and Investment (MPI). The SDG process has been politically anchored at the National Council for Sustainable Development and Competitiveness, chaired by the Deputy Prime Minister and with the MPI Minister as permanent vice-chair. With the Prime Minister's adoption of the 2017 National Action Plan (NAP) for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda, Vietnam has nationalized the SDG agenda and created the legal basis to make commitments to the international community. The NAP covers 17 SDGs with 115 targets relevant to Viet Nam and establishes responsibilities for their implementation. To monitor the implementation of the NAP, the General Statistics Office of Vietnam (GSO) developed 158 indicators that measure progress in implementing the 17 SDGs. Responsibility for monitoring and reporting on the indicators was assigned to 22 ministries and government agencies in 2019. Since many of the indicators in Vietnam do not yet have a methodological framework or values, the previous GIZ programme has supported the development of new indicators, particularly in the areas of green growth, gender, and people with disabilities.
Under the predecessor programme "Macroeconomic Reforms / Socially and Environmentally Sustainable Growth", GIZ supported the Vietnamese process on SDG implementation and monitoring (Output F: "The capacities of the Vietnamese government to implement the 2030 Agenda are improved"). Activities until the end of the programme in December 2018 focused on supporting partners in coordinating the process, engaging stakeholders, developing the NAP, developing provincial and sectoral action plans, developing the indicators to monitor the implementation of the NAP, and preparing and presenting the first Voluntary National Review in 2018 at the United Nations High-Level Political Forum in New York.
While the Covid 19 pandemic has exacerbated the challenges of SDG implementation, it has also opened up new opportunities for a post-Covid 19 agenda that could focus on building or strengthening sustainable and resilient social and economic structures. While the pandemic has not directly affected access to health, education or food in Vietnam so far, the country, like many others, has been severely affected by declining government revenues, falling private investment and rising underemployment. Despite the comparatively high level, economic growth in 2020, at 2.91 percent, fell short of expectations and averages in recent years. The challenges of financing the NAP have increased accordingly. At the same time, the pandemic holds the potential to anchor the SDGs more firmly in strategies and policies for socio-economic recovery. This could not only promote a socially, economically and ecologically sustainable recovery, but also increase policy coherence.
Objective of the SDG Output: The overall programme has recently been amended by an additional output focusing on SDG monitoring and implementation. The additional output 5 reads as follows: Conditions for whole-of-government implementation and monitoring of the SDGs, taking into account the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, are improved. To achieve the output, activities are planned in three areas of action.
- Strengthen monitoring and reporting on NAP implementation at international, national and subnational levels;
- Support MPI in identifying and mobilizing resources for SDG implementation in Vietnam for sustainable post-Covid 19 recovery;
- Accompanying the national stakeholder engagement process for coordination in SDG implementation among government and non-government actors;
The primary target group is the by the Department of Science, Education, National Resources and Environment at the Ministry of Planning and Investment (MPI) as well as the General Statistics Office (GSO) of Vietnam. Further target groups include other national and subnational government agencies, the private sector, research institutions as well as civil society organizations.
The programme builds on the lessons learned from the predecessor project. The medium-term to long-term effectiveness of the programme will depend on the integration of sustainability aspects into the country"s socio-economic planning processes and the interlinking of these aspects with financing processes (public budget and private sector). The Vietnamese administration"s strong emphasis on legal frameworks and planning processes increases the likelihood of inputs remaining effective over the long term. Contributing systematically to national policy-making processes requires a strong and constant cooperation with relevant government bodies, first and foremost with the MPI.
GIZ may optionally commission contract amendments and/or increases based on the criteria in the tender documents to the successful bidder of this tender. For details, please see the terms of reference.
Abschnitt IV: Verfahren
Abschnitt V: Auftragsvergabe
Auftragsvergabe GOPA Consultants
Postanschrift:[gelöscht]
Ort: Bad Homburg
NUTS-Code: DE718 Hochtaunuskreis
Postleitzahl: 61348
Land: Deutschland
E-Mail: [gelöscht]
Abschnitt VI: Weitere Angaben
Bekanntmachungs-ID: CXTRYY6YKYB
Postanschrift:[gelöscht]
Ort: Bonn
Postleitzahl: 53123
Land: Deutschland
E-Mail: [gelöscht]
Telefon: [gelöscht]
Fax: [gelöscht]
Internet-Adresse: https://www.bundeskartellamt.de
According to Article 160, Section 3 of the German Act Against Restraint of Competition (GWB), application for review is not permissible insofar as
1. the applicant has identified the claimed infringement of the procurement rules before submitting the application for review and has not submitted a complaint to the contracting authority within a period of 10 calendar days; the expiry of the period pursuant to Article 134, Section 2 remains unaffected,
2. complaints of infringements of procurement rules that are evident in the tender notice are not submitted to the contracting authority at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for the application or by the deadline for the submission of bids, specified in the tender notice.
3. complaints of infringements of procurement rules that first become evident in the tender documents are not submitted to the contracting authority at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for application or by the deadline for the submission of bids,
4. more than 15 calendar days have expired since receipt of notification from the contracting authority that it is unwilling to redress the complaint.
Sentence 1 does not apply in the case of an application to determine the invalidity of the contract in accordance with Article 135, Section 1 (2). Article 134, Section 1, Sentence 2 remains unaffected.