5.1.1.
Zweck
Art des Auftrags: Lieferungen
Haupteinstufung (cpv): 31643000 Teilchenbeschleuniger
Zusätzliche Einstufung (cpv): 38000000 Laborgeräte, optische Geräte und Präzisionsgeräte (außer Gläser), 42000000 Industrielle Maschinen
5.1.2.
Erfüllungsort
Postanschrift: Planckstr. 1
Stadt: Darmstadt
Postleitzahl: 64291
Land, Gliederung (NUTS): Darmstadt, Kreisfreie Stadt (DE711)
Land: Deutschland
5.1.6.
Allgemeine Informationen
Auftragsvergabeprojekt nicht aus EU-Mitteln finanziert
Die Beschaffung fällt unter das Übereinkommen über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen: ja
5.1.7.
Strategische Auftragsvergabe
Ziel der strategischen Auftragsvergabe: Keine strategische Beschaffung
5.1.10.
Zuschlagskriterien
Kriterium:
Art: Preis
Bezeichnung: Price
Beschreibung: Consideration of the price through the valuation method "Preis-Quotient-Methode"
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 50,00
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Design process Detailing of the design concept
Beschreibung: Logical and comprehensible presentation of the design concept. Detailed description of production and manufacturing processes, including technical equipment. Detailed procedure ensuring compliance with crucial manufacturing tolerances. Clear explanation of how specifications are met, including manufacturing, assembly, and testing procedures. Demonstration of a high-quality, state-of-the-art production chain. Proposals for technical improvements and detailed explanations of changes. Dedicated personnel assigned to the project for seamless execution and timely delivery. The proposal must clearly state the planned materials used for production, ensuring they meet required specifications. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 15,00
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Production: Description of all production steps ensuring compliance with all technical precision specifications and quality features
Beschreibung: Detailed description of all necessary production and manufacturing processes, including technical equipment. Clear demonstration of how specifications are met, covering manufacturing, assembly, and testing procedures. Comprehensive planning of resources, coordination efforts, and availability of materials/components. Statements concerning subcontractors and the quality of materials and components used in production. Evaluation of the production chain, focusing on the quality and technological advancement of machines and tools used. Assessment of welding methods for accuracy, safety, and prevention of deformation. Evaluation of surface treatment and cleaning processes, with preference for those ensuring vacuum compatibility. Clear methodology for achieving and guaranteeing specified manufacturing tolerances. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 12,50
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Quality assurance and documentation
Beschreibung: Precise explanation of the QA approach and its involvement in all manufacturing and acceptance tests. Evaluation of how QA is integrated into visual, mechanical, and vacuum and relative magentic permiability tests to ensure design goals. Assessment of how well the described test methods detect errors early, limit, and eliminate them efficiently. Standard-compliant QA documentation, adherence to FAIR standards, and structured reporting on technical characteristics. Relevant certifications for critical production steps (e.g., welding) and compliance with industry standards. Evaluation of professional risk assessment regarding hazards, declaration of incorporation, and mitigation strategies. Logical and transparent offer description; unclear scope is considered a project risk. Assessment of potential project risks that could cause delays or non-fulfillment of goals. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 12,50
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Compliance with the time and delivery schedule
Beschreibung: Clear commitment to meeting the agreed delivery schedule with realistic planning. Well-defined project timeline, milestones, and checkpoints to track progress. Assessment of readiness regarding production capacity, material availability, and supply chain stability. Logistical considerations, including shipping, packaging, and handling for safe and timely delivery. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 10,00
5.1.15.
Techniken
Rahmenvereinbarung:
Keine Rahmenvereinbarung
Informationen über das dynamische Beschaffungssystem:
Kein dynamisches Beschaffungssystem
Elektronische Auktion: nein
5.1.16.
Weitere Informationen, Schlichtung und Nachprüfung
Überprüfungsstelle: Vergabekammer des Bundes
Informationen über die Überprüfungsfristen: The competent investigating authority is as follows Vergabekammer des Bundes Villemombler Str. 76 D-53123 Bonn, Germany Tel.: 0228 9499-0 Fax: 0228 9499-163 Email: vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de Web: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html The applicant is requested to clearly identify those parts of the request to participate (and any subsequent bid) containing company/business secrets. If this does not happen, the public procurement tribunal will assume consent to inspect the documents as required in the case of carrying out a review procedure (Section 165 (3) Act against Restraints of Competition (Competition Act - GWB)). As the awarding authority, FAIR is required to provide the public procurement tribunal with immediate access to the files when a review procedure is initiated (Section 163 (2) sentence 3 GWB). Applicants/bidders have the right to demand that the Contracting authority comply with the provisions on the award procedure protecting bidders (Section 97 (6) GWB). Applicants/bidders with an interest in the public contract who believe their rights have been violated by non-compliance with the provisions governing the awarding of public contracts, must raise an objection about the violation to FAIR within ten calendar days (Section 160 (3) sentence 1 no. 1 GWB). Violations known from the tender notice or tender documents must be claimed vis-a-vis FAIR before the time limit given for submission of applications (offers) (Section 160 (3) 1 No. 2 - 3 GWB). If FAIR informs the applicant/bidder that it is unwilling to redress the objection, an application for review may then be filed with the public procurement tribunal above within 15 days of receipt of the notification (Section 160 (3) sentence 1 no. 4 GWB). Bidders whose bids are not to be considered for the award of the contract will be notified before the awarding of the contract pursuant to Section 134 GWB. A contract may only be concluded 15 calendar days after FAIR has sent out this information. This period is ten calendar days when transmission is by fax or email. The period commences on the day following the dispatch of the information by FAIR. After this time period has expired, an award is possible even if a time limit pursuant to Section 160 (3) GWB has yet to expire. Therefore, in order to prevent an award, a request for review needs to have been served upon FAIR by the public procurement tribunal before the expiry of the time limit under Section 134 GWB. Pursuant to Section 135 (1) and (2) GWB, the invalidity of an award can only be established if it has been asserted in the review procedure within 30 calendar days from the date on which there was notification on the conclusion of the agreement, though no later than six months after the agreement was concluded. If the Contracting authority published the tender notice in the Official Journal of the European Union, the time limit for claiming ineffectiveness shall expire 30 calendar days after the publication of the tender notice in the Official Journal of the European Union. Information pursuant to Art. 13 GDPR on the processing of your personal data within the scope of our business relationship is available at: www.gsi.de/data-protection
Organisation, die zusätzliche Informationen über das Vergabeverfahren bereitstellt: FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH
Organisation, die weitere Informationen für die Nachprüfungsverfahren bereitstellt: Vergabekammer des Bundes