Öffentliche Ausschreibung Darmstadt 2024 Deutschland - Gasleitungen

Deutschland - Gasleitungen - SFRS Technical-Gas-System

1. Beschaffer

1.1 Beschaffer

Offizielle Bezeichnung: FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH

Rechtsform des Erwerbers: Von einer zentralen Regierungsbehörde kontrolliertes öffentliches Unternehmen

Tätigkeit des öffentlichen Auftraggebers: Bildung

2. Verfahren

2.1 Verfahren

Titel: SFRS Technical-Gas-System

Beschreibung: Planning, realisation, delivery and installation of the Super-FRS technical gas system, including but not limited to: a 3D model of the pipes and elements to supply the gas as specified, a list of elements, a planning of the control for the system, a description of the system and an operation instruction of it, the on-site realisation and installation of the system

Kennung des Verfahrens: ede38ba8-ecb2-447e-ab24-366ba42c76f5

Vorherige Bekanntmachung: 436007-2023

Verfahrensart: Verhandlungsverfahren mit vorheriger Veröffentlichung eines Aufrufs zum Wettbewerb/Verhandlungsverfahren

2.1.1 Zweck

Art des Auftrags: Lieferungen

Haupteinstufung (cpv): 44161100 Gasleitungen

2.1.2 Erfüllungsort

Postanschrift: FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH Planckstr. 1

Stadt: Darmstadt

Postleitzahl: 64291

Land, Gliederung (NUTS): Darmstadt, Kreisfreie Stadt (DE711)

Land: Deutschland

Ort im betreffenden Land

2.1.4 Allgemeine Informationen

Zusätzliche Informationen: Bekanntmachungs-ID: CXP4YY4H45S

Rechtsgrundlage:

Richtlinie 2014/24/EU

vgv -

5. Los

5.1 Los: LOT-0001

Titel: SFRS Technical-Gas-System

Interne Kennung: #1

5.1.1 Zweck

Art des Auftrags: Lieferungen

Haupteinstufung (cpv): 44161100 Gasleitungen

5.1.2 Erfüllungsort

Postanschrift: FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH Planckstr. 1

Stadt: Darmstadt

Postleitzahl: 64291

Land, Gliederung (NUTS): Darmstadt, Kreisfreie Stadt (DE711)

Land: Deutschland

Ort im betreffenden Land

Zusätzliche Informationen:

5.1.6 Allgemeine Informationen

Auftragsvergabeprojekt nicht aus EU-Mitteln finanziert

Die Beschaffung fällt unter das Übereinkommen über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen

Informationen über frühere Bekanntmachungen:

Kennung der vorherigen Bekanntmachung: 436007-2023

5.1.7 Strategische Auftragsvergabe

Ziel der strategischen Auftragsvergabe: Keine strategische Beschaffung

5.1.10 Zuschlagskriterien

Kriterium:

Art: Qualität

Bezeichnung: Concept of realization

Beschreibung: Concept of realization A short description of the project realization is expected. The description of the con-ceptual implementation should clearly show how the bidder will achieve compliance with the technical specifications. This includes a description of the project planning including resource planning and estimated coordination effort. The completeness, the level of detail and the plausibility of the information provided are evaluated. The bidder should also describe how the solution is structured. The efficiency of the structure (space requirements, accessibility, susceptibility to faults, ease of use of the system) and the ease of repair and maintenance (effort, resources required) are evaluated positively.

Gewichtung (Prozentanteil, genau): 40

Kriterium:

Art: Qualität

Bezeichnung: Quality assurance and testing concept

Beschreibung: Quality assurance and testing concept A description of the technical equipment, the company's quality assurance measures and the planned sequence of acceptance tests is expected. In particular: (a) The project-specific QA/QC planning, including the design phase, manufacture and procurement of tools, materials used, production (work instructions), assembly, installation, commissioning, documentation (non-conformance reporting) and task management. This also includes all planned measuring equipment and measuring procedures. The methods described are intended to detect faults at an early stage, contain them and eliminate them efficiently. b) The measures for quality assurance in general and the test processes in the specif-ic production sequence are to be described. This also includes the description of early error detection mechanisms, as well as the logging of the specifications in the production process. It should become apparent how the measures contribute to the fulfillment of the specifications and how the technical characteristics are controlled and recorded. It is evaluated whether the test methods described can detect errors at an early stage, limit them and correct them efficiently. The planned documentation of the tests is also included in the evaluation. The completeness, the level of detail and the plausibility of the information provided are evaluated

Gewichtung (Prozentanteil, genau): 30

Kriterium:

Art: Qualität

Bezeichnung: Detailed schedule

Beschreibung: Detailed schedule It is particularly important for the contracting authority that the bidder submits its own reliable and detailed design, production and installation plan with reference to the schedule specified by the contracting authority (taking into account the pro-curement processes and the procedure to be followed in the event of any delays in delivery or service caused by subcontractors). The schedule should show the individ-ual process steps. The schedule supplied with the order should be critically evaluated and supplemented with plausible reasons at all stages of the project: planning, de-sign, manufacture of the components, factory acceptance, transport and assembly and installation of the components. Compliance with the specified schedule, completeness, the degree of detail and the plausibility of the information provided are evaluated.

Gewichtung (Prozentanteil, genau): 30

5.1.12 Bedingungen für die Auftragsvergabe

Informationen über die Überprüfungsfristen: The competent reviewing authority is Federal Public Procurement Tribunal Villemombler Straße 76 53123 Bonn Tel.: 0228 9499-0 Fax: 0228 9499-163 Email: vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de Website: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html Candidate/ Bidder is requested to clearly identify those sections of the participation application (and eventually of the tender, if applicable) that contain a trade or busi-ness secret. If Bidder fails to do so, the Public Procurement Tribunal may, in the case of a review procedure, assume that Bidder has agreed to have these documents inspected (§165 para. 3 GWB). As Awarding Authority, FAIR is obliged to make the tender file available to the Public Procurement Tribunal immediately when initiating a review procedure (§ 163 para. 2 cl. 3 GWB). Candidates/ Bidders have a right to expect the contracting authority's compliance with the Bidder-protecting provisions re: the tender procedure (§ 97 para. 6 GWB). If Candidate/ Bidder interested in the contract considers that Bidder's rights have been infringed through failure to comply with award regulations, the infringement must be reported to FAIR within ten calen-dar days (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 nr. 1 GWB). Infringements identifiable on the basis of the announcement or the award docu-ments must be asserted against FAIR within the deadline for submission of applications (or tenders) specified in the announcement (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 nr. 2 - 3 GWB). If FAIR informs Candidate/ Bidder that FAIR is unwilling to redress its complaint, it is possible to file an appeal for review with the aforementioned Public Procurement Tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the notification (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 nr. 4 GWB). Bidders whose tenders are not to be considered for the award will be informed prior to the award according to § 134 GWB. A contract may only be concluded 15 calen-dar days after this information has been sent by FAIR. In the case of transmission by fax or electronic means, this period shall be ten calendar days. It commences on the day after dispatch of the information by FAIR. After this period has expired, a sur-charge is possible, even if the deadline is not passed according to § 160 para. 3 GWB. An application for review would therefore have to be delivered to FAIR by the Public Procurement Tribunal before the expiry of the deadline according to § 134 GWB in order to prevent a surcharge. According to § 135 para. 1 and 2 GWB, the ineffectiveness of a commission can only be established if it has been asserted in the review procedure within 30 calendar days of the conclusion of the contract but not later than six months after the conclusion of the contract. If the contracting entity has published the award in Official Journal of the European Union, the period un-enforceability shall end 30 calendar days after announcement of the publication of the award in Official Journal of the European Union. Information pursuant to Art. 13 GDPR on the processing of your personal data within the scope of our business relationship is available at: www.gsi.de/data-protection

5.1.15 Techniken

Rahmenvereinbarung:

Keine Rahmenvereinbarung

Informationen über das dynamische Beschaffungssystem

Kein dynamisches Beschaffungssystem

Elektronische Auktion:

5.1.16 Weitere Informationen, Schlichtung und Nachprüfung

Überprüfungsstelle: Vergabekammer des Bundes

Organisation, die zusätzliche Informationen über das Vergabeverfahren bereitstellt: FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH

6. Ergebnisse

6.1 Ergebnis, Los-– Kennung: LOT-0001

Ein Wettbewerbsgewinner wurde noch nicht ermittelt, der Wettbewerb ist noch nicht abgeschlossen.

6.1.4 Statistische Informationen

Eingegangene Angebote oder Teilnahmeanträge:

Art der eingegangenen Einreichungen: Angebote