SC_yoke_steel
Bekanntmachung vergebener Aufträge
Ergebnisse des Vergabeverfahrens
Lieferauftrag
Abschnitt I: Öffentlicher Auftraggeber
Postanschrift:[gelöscht]
Ort: Darmstadt
NUTS-Code: DE711 Darmstadt, Kreisfreie Stadt
Postleitzahl: 64291
Land: Deutschland
E-Mail: [gelöscht]
Telefon: [gelöscht]
Internet-Adresse(n):
Hauptadresse: http://www.fair-center.de
Abschnitt II: Gegenstand
SC_yoke_steel
Silicon iron sheet metal material for the production of superconducting magnets for the SIS100 accelerator. No variation of the magnetic characteristics allowed to achieve the same homogeneity as within first batch.
FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH Planckstr. 1 64291 Darmstadt
Iron shield metal production from as small number of melts as possible according to specification.
Abschnitt IV: Verfahren
- Die betreffenden Erzeugnisse werden gemäß den in der Richtlinie genannten Bedingungen ausschließlich für Forschungs-, Versuchs-, Untersuchungs- oder Entwicklungszwecke hergestellt
- Die Bauleistungen/Lieferungen/Dienstleistungen können aus folgenden Gründen nur von einem bestimmten Wirtschaftsteilnehmer ausgeführt werden:
- nicht vorhandener Wettbewerb aus technischen Gründen
No variation of the magnetic characteristics were allowed in order to to achieve the same homogeneity as within first batch.
Abschnitt V: Auftragsvergabe
4700002584
Postanschrift:[gelöscht]
Ort: Hagen
NUTS-Code: DEA53 Hagen, Kreisfreie Stadt
Postleitzahl: 58093
Land: Deutschland
Abschnitt VI: Weitere Angaben
Postanschrift:[gelöscht]
Ort: Bonn
Postleitzahl: 53123
Land: Deutschland
E-Mail: [gelöscht]
Telefon: [gelöscht]
Fax: [gelöscht]
Internet-Adresse: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html
The competent reviewing authority is
Federal Public Procurement Tribunal
Villemombler Straße 76
53123 Bonn
Tel.: 0228 9499-0
Fax: 02[gelöscht]
Email: [gelöscht]
Website: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de
Candidate/ Bidder is requested to clearly identify those sections of the participation application (and eventually of the tender,
if applicable) that contain a trade or business secret. If Bidder fails to do so, the Public Procurement Tribunal may, in the case
of a review procedure, assume that Bidder has agreed to have these documents inspected (§165 para. 3 GWB). As Awarding
Authority, FAIR is obliged to make the tender file available to the Public Procurement Tribunal immediately when initiating a
review procedure (§ 163 para. 2 cl. 3 GWB).
Candidates/ Bidders have a right to expect the contracting authority's compliance with the Bidder-protecting provisions re: the
tender procedure (§ 97 para. 6 GWB). If Candidate/ Bidder interested in the contract considers that Bidder's rights have been
infringed through failure to comply with award regulations, the infringement must be reported to FAIR within ten calendar days
(§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 nr. 1 GWB).
Infringements identifiable on the basis of the announcement or the award documents must be asserted against FAIR within the
deadline for submission of ap-plications (or tenders) specified in the announcement (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 nr. 2 - 3 GWB).
If FAIR informs Candidate/ Bidder that FAIR is unwilling to redress its complaint, it is possible to file an appeal for review with
the aforementioned Public Procure-ment Tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the notification (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 nr. 4 GWB).
Bidders whose tenders are not to be considered for the award will be informed prior to the award according to § 134 GWB. A
contract may only be concluded 15 calendar days after this information has been sent by FAIR. In the case of trans-mission
by fax or electronic means, this period shall be ten calendar days. It commences on the day after dispatch of the information
by FAIR. After this period has expired, a surcharge is possible, even if the deadline is not passed accord-ing to § 160 para. 3
GWB. An application for review would therefore have to be delivered to FAIR by the Public Procurement Tribunal before the
expiry of the deadline according to § 134 GWB in order to prevent a surcharge.
According to § 135 para. 1 and 2 GWB, the ineffectiveness of a commission can only be established if it has been asserted
in the review procedure within 30 cal-endar days of the conclusion of the contract but not later than six months after the
conclusion of the contract. If the contracting entity has published the award in Official Journal of the European Union, the
period unenforceability shall end 30 calendar days after announcement of the publication of the award in Official Journal of the
European Union.
Information pursuant to Art. 13 GDPR on the processing of your personal data within the scope of our business relationship is
available at: