5.1.1.
Zweck
Art des Auftrags: Lieferleistungen
Haupteinstufung (cpv): 38000000 Laborgeräte, optische Geräte und Präzisionsgeräte (außer Gläser)
Optionen:
Beschreibung der Optionen: Maintenance
5.1.2.
Erfüllungsort
Postanschrift: Planckstr. 1
Stadt: Darmstadt
Postleitzahl: 64291
Land, Gliederung (NUTS): Darmstadt, Kreisfreie Stadt (DE711)
Land: Deutschland
Zusätzliche Informationen: FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH Planckstrasse 1 64291 Darmstadt
5.1.6.
Allgemeine Informationen
Auftragsvergabeprojekt nicht aus EU-Mitteln finanziert
Die Beschaffung fällt unter das Übereinkommen über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen: ja
5.1.7.
Strategische Auftragsvergabe
Ziel der strategischen Auftragsvergabe: Verringerung der Auswirkungen auf die Umwelt
Beschreibung: The devices can be repaired or have modules replaced, and they feature an energy-saving mode.
Konzept zur Verringerung der Umweltauswirkungen: Sonstiges
5.1.10.
Zuschlagskriterien
Kriterium:
Art: Preis
Bezeichnung: Price
Beschreibung: Consideration of the price through the valuation method "Preis-Quotient-Methode"
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 40
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Completeness and Quality of the Bid Documents
Beschreibung: "Under this award criterion, an assessment is made of the extent to which the bid documents demonstrate that the proposed system fully meets the technical, qualitative, and functional requirements specified in the procurement documents. In particular, it is important to the contracting authority that the bid clearly shows how the proposed solution fully complies with the order specification. A positive evaluation is given, in particular, for a clearly structured, technically precise, and consistent description of the system configuration and quality assurance. Low scores will be awarded to bids whose documentation is incomplete, contains only general or unreliable statements, or fails to describe the technical implementation and acceptance testing in sufficient detail."
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 12
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Quality Assurance, Acceptance Testing, and Documentation
Beschreibung: "The evaluation focuses on the completeness, traceability, and technical quality of the quality assurance description as well as the technical documentation. The decisive factor is the extent to which the bidder demonstrates that the required quality is ensured, that compliance with the technical requirements is verified through appropriate testing and acceptance procedures, and that the results are documented in a traceable manner. A positive evaluation is given in particular for a clear, complete, and consistent description of the quality assurance measures, the testing and acceptance procedures, and the intended documentation. Bids will receive a lower score if their explanations remain too general, fail to describe essential elements of the testing and documentation concept in sufficient detail, or leave doubts regarding the reliability of the quality assurance and verification process. Evidence of examples of acceptance tests and documentation."
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 15
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Delivery time, installation and training
Beschreibung: "The assessment focuses on the transparency and plausibility of the quoted delivery time, installation, and training. It is particularly important to the client that the delivery time, installation period, and training period specified by the client be confirmed. Shorter, plausibly presented timeframes (delivery time, installation period, and training period) will be evaluated positively. Longer timeframes (delivery time, installation period, and training period) will receive a correspondingly lower score, down to 0 points. Furthermore, the bidder"s description of the measures to be taken in the event of impending delivery delays will be evaluated."
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 18
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Repair Services and Sustainability
Beschreibung: The evaluation focuses on the availability of spare parts and on site services, preferably for ten years, service response within 48 h. Availability of spare parts longer than 10 years and service response shorter than 48 h will be evaluated positively. Shorter Availability and longer response time will receive a lower score.
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 15
5.1.15.
Techniken
Rahmenvereinbarung:
Keine Rahmenvereinbarung
Informationen über das dynamische Beschaffungssystem:
Kein dynamisches Beschaffungssystem
5.1.16.
Weitere Informationen, Schlichtung und Nachprüfung
Überprüfungsstelle: Vergabekammer des Bundes
Informationen über die Überprüfungsfristen: The competent investigating authority is as follows Vergabekammer des Bundes Villemombler Str. 76 D-53123 Bonn, Germany Tel.: 0228 9499-0 Fax: 0228 9499-163 Email: vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de Web: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html The applicant is requested to clearly identify those parts of the request to participate (and any subsequent bid) containing company/business secrets. If this does not happen, the public procurement tribunal will assume consent to inspect the documents as required in the case of carrying out a review procedure (Section 165 (3) Act against Restraints of Competition (Competition Act - GWB)). As the awarding authority, FAIR is required to provide the public procurement tribunal with immediate access to the files when a review procedure is initiated (Section 163 (2) sentence 3 GWB). Applicants/bidders have the right to demand that the Contracting authority comply with the provisions on the award procedure protecting bidders (Section 97 (6) GWB). Applicants/bidders with an interest in the public contract who believe their rights have been violated by non-compliance with the provisions governing the awarding of public contracts, must raise an objection about the violation to FAIR within ten calendar days (Section 160 (3) sentence 1 no. 1 GWB). Violations known from the tender notice or tender documents must be claimed vis-a-vis FAIR before the time limit given for submission of applications (offers) (Section 160 (3) 1 No. 2 - 3 GWB). If FAIR informs the applicant/bidder that it is unwilling to redress the objection, an application for review may then be filed with the public procurement tribunal above within 15 days of receipt of the notification (Section 160 (3) sentence 1 no. 4 GWB). Bidders whose bids are not to be considered for the award of the contract will be notified before the awarding of the contract pursuant to Section 134 GWB. A contract may only be concluded 15 calendar days after FAIR has sent out this information. This period is ten calendar days when transmission is by fax or email. The period commences on the day following the dispatch of the information by FAIR. After this time period has expired, an award is possible even if a time limit pursuant to Section 160 (3) GWB has yet to expire. Therefore, in order to prevent an award, a request for review needs to have been served upon FAIR by the public procurement tribunal before the expiry of the time limit under Section 134 GWB. Pursuant to Section 135 (1) and (2) GWB, the invalidity of an award can only be established if it has been asserted in the review procedure within 30 calendar days from the date on which there was notification on the conclusion of the agreement, though no later than six months after the agreement was concluded. If the Contracting authority published the tender notice in the Official Journal of the European Union, the time limit for claiming ineffectiveness shall expire 30 calendar days after the publication of the tender notice in the Official Journal of the European Union. Information pursuant to Art. 13 GDPR on the processing of your personal data within the scope of our business relationship is available at: www.gsi.de/data-protection FAIR Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH
Organisation, die zusätzliche Informationen über das Vergabeverfahren bereitstellt: FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH
Organisation, die weitere Informationen für die Nachprüfungsverfahren bereitstellt: Vergabekammer des Bundes