5.1.1.
Zweck
Art des Auftrags: Lieferleistungen
Haupteinstufung (cpv): 31643000 Teilchenbeschleuniger
Optionen:
Beschreibung der Optionen: - Gestell zur Demontage und Wiedermontage der Kammer - Installation auf der FAIR-Baustelle
5.1.2.
Erfüllungsort
Postanschrift: Planckstr. 1
Stadt: Darmstadt
Postleitzahl: 64291
Land, Gliederung (NUTS): Darmstadt, Kreisfreie Stadt (DE711)
Land: Deutschland
5.1.6.
Allgemeine Informationen
Auftragsvergabeprojekt nicht aus EU-Mitteln finanziert
Die Beschaffung fällt unter das Übereinkommen über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen: ja
5.1.7.
Strategische Auftragsvergabe
Ziel der strategischen Auftragsvergabe: Keine strategische Beschaffung
5.1.10.
Zuschlagskriterien
Kriterium:
Art: Preis
Bezeichnung: Price
Beschreibung: Consideration of the price through the valuation method "Preis-Quotient-Methode"
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 30
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Production
Beschreibung: - Description of the Manufacturing Design Review (MDR) approach, including verification of manufacturability, assembly feasibility, and identification of risks prior to production. - Detailed production plan including sequence of fabrication, welding, machining, surface treatment, cleaning, and assembly. - Description of available technical equipment and facilities (e.g., machining capacity, welding processes, vacuum preparation infrastructure). - Demonstration of capability to meet required tolerances (ISO 2768-1 mK, EN ISO 13920 BF) and vacuum requirements (? 1×10?7 mbar).
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 17,5
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Quality Assurance
Beschreibung: - Description of the contractor"s Quality Management System (ISO 9001) and welding quality system (ISO 3834). - Detailed QA plan covering all phases: procurement, manufacturing, assembly, inspection, and testing. - Description of inspection and test procedures, including: o Visual inspection o Dimensional inspection o Non-destructive testing (ISO 9712) o Vacuum testing (leak rate, RGA, pump-down curve) - Approach to Factory Acceptance Test (FAT), including documentation, traceability, and compliance with FAIR technical guidelines. - System for Non-Conformance Reporting (NCR) and corrective actions. - Identification of technical and schedule risks, including mitigation strategies. - Availability of qualified personnel (welding, NDT, QA).
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 14
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Personnel Safety Control System
Beschreibung: o Availability of qualified personnel for programming and commissioning of safety PLC systems. o Ability to provide a documented safety concept, including risk assessment and validation.
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 14
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Compliance with Schedule
Beschreibung: - Binding project schedule including all key milestones: o Manufacturing Design Review (MDR) o Start of production o Intermediate inspections o Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) o Delivery and installation - Demonstration of readiness to start production immediately after contract award, including availability of: o Materials o Manufacturing capacity o Qualified personnel - Identification of critical path activities and potential bottlenecks (e.g., welding, machining, procurement of long-lead items). - Description of supply chain strategy, including secured suppliers and lead times. - Description of internal project management structure and reporting (monthly progress reports as per specification). - Confirmation of ability to meet the required delivery deadline under the given installation constraints. - Contingency planning: o Alternative suppliers o Redundancy in production capacity o Mitigation measures for delays - Description of packaging, transport, and delivery logistics in compliance with FAIR guidelines.
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 24,5
5.1.15.
Techniken
Rahmenvereinbarung:
Keine Rahmenvereinbarung
Informationen über das dynamische Beschaffungssystem:
Kein dynamisches Beschaffungssystem
5.1.16.
Weitere Informationen, Schlichtung und Nachprüfung
Überprüfungsstelle: Vergabekammer des Bundes
Informationen über die Überprüfungsfristen: The competent investigating authority is as follows Vergabekammer des Bundes Villemombler Str. 76 D-53123 Bonn, Germany Tel.: 0228 9499-0 Fax: 0228 9499-163 Email: vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de Web: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html The applicant is requested to clearly identify those parts of the request to participate (and any subsequent bid) containing company/business secrets. If this does not happen, the public procurement tribunal will assume consent to inspect the documents as required in the case of carrying out a review procedure (Section 165 (3) Act against Restraints of Competition (Competition Act - GWB)). As the awarding authority, FAIR is required to provide the public procurement tribunal with immediate access to the files when a review procedure is initiated (Section 163 (2) sentence 3 GWB). Applicants/bidders have the right to demand that the Contracting authority comply with the provisions on the award procedure protecting bidders (Section 97 (6) GWB). Applicants/bidders with an interest in the public contract who believe their rights have been violated by non-compliance with the provisions governing the awarding of public contracts, must raise an objection about the violation to FAIR within ten calendar days (Section 160 (3) sentence 1 no. 1 GWB). Violations known from the tender notice or tender documents must be claimed vis-a-vis FAIR before the time limit given for submission of applications (offers) (Section 160 (3) 1 No. 2 - 3 GWB). If FAIR informs the applicant/bidder that it is unwilling to redress the objection, an application for review may then be filed with the public procurement tribunal above within 15 days of receipt of the notification (Section 160 (3) sentence 1 no. 4 GWB). Bidders whose bids are not to be considered for the award of the contract will be notified before the awarding of the contract pursuant to Section 134 GWB. A contract may only be concluded 15 calendar days after FAIR has sent out this information. This period is ten calendar days when transmission is by fax or email. The period commences on the day following the dispatch of the information by FAIR. After this time period has expired, an award is possible even if a time limit pursuant to Section 160 (3) GWB has yet to expire. Therefore, in order to prevent an award, a request for review needs to have been served upon FAIR by the public procurement tribunal before the expiry of the time limit under Section 134 GWB. Pursuant to Section 135 (1) and (2) GWB, the invalidity of an award can only be established if it has been asserted in the review procedure within 30 calendar days from the date on which there was notification on the conclusion of the agreement, though no later than six months after the agreement was concluded. If the Contracting authority published the tender notice in the Official Journal of the European Union, the time limit for claiming ineffectiveness shall expire 30 calendar days after the publication of the tender notice in the Official Journal of the European Union. Information pursuant to Art. 13 GDPR on the processing of your personal data within the scope of our business relationship is available at: www.gsi.de/data-protection FAIR Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH
Organisation, die zusätzliche Informationen über das Vergabeverfahren bereitstellt: FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH