5.1.1.
Zweck
Art des Auftrags: Lieferungen
Haupteinstufung (cpv): 31643000 Teilchenbeschleuniger
Zusätzliche Einstufung (cpv): 42000000 Industrielle Maschinen, 42123000 Kompressoren
5.1.2.
Erfüllungsort
Stadt: 64291 Darmstadt
Land, Gliederung (NUTS): Darmstadt, Kreisfreie Stadt (DE711)
Land: Deutschland
5.1.6.
Allgemeine Informationen
Auftragsvergabeprojekt nicht aus EU-Mitteln finanziert
Die Beschaffung fällt unter das Übereinkommen über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen: ja
5.1.7.
Strategische Auftragsvergabe
Ziel der strategischen Auftragsvergabe: Keine strategische Beschaffung
5.1.10.
Zuschlagskriterien
Kriterium:
Art: Preis
Bezeichnung: Price
Beschreibung: Consideration of the price through the valuation method "tenderfile_valuation_ufabII_label"
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 45,00
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Compliance with the time and delivery schedule
Beschreibung: Clear commitment to meeting the agreed delivery schedule with realistic planning. Well-defined project timeline, milestones, and checkpoints to track progress. Assessment of readiness regarding production capacity, material availability, and supply chain stability. Logistical considerations, including shipping, packaging, and handling for safe and timely delivery. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 13,75
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Design Process
Beschreibung: Logical and comprehensible presentation of the design concept. Detailed description of production and manufacturing processes, including technical equipment. Detailed procedure ensuring compliance with crucial manufacturing tolerances. Clear explanation of how specifications are met, including manufacturing, assembly, and testing procedures. Demonstration of a high-quality, state-of-the-art production chain. Proposals for technical improvements and detailed explanations of changes. Dedicated personnel assigned to the project for seamless execution and timely delivery. The proposal must clearly state the planned materials used for production, ensuring they meet required specifications. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 13,75
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Quality Assurance and Documentation
Beschreibung: Precise explanation of the QA approach and its involvement in all manufacturing and acceptance tests. Evaluation of how QA is integrated into visual, mechanical, and vacuum and relative magentic permiability tests to ensure design goals. Assessment of how well the described test methods detect errors early, limit, and eliminate them efficiently. Standard-compliant QA documentation, adherence to FAIR standards, and structured reporting on technical characteristics. Relevant certifications for critical production steps (e.g., welding) and compliance with industry standards. Evaluation of professional risk assessment regarding hazards, declaration of incorporation, and mitigation strategies. Logical and transparent offer description; unclear scope is considered a project risk. Assessment of potential project risks that could cause delays or non-fulfillment of goals. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 13,75
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Production
Beschreibung: Detailed description of all necessary production and manufacturing processes, including technical equipment. Clear demonstration of how specifications are met, covering manufacturing, assembly, and testing procedures. Comprehensive planning of resources, coordination efforts, and availability of materials/components. Statements concerning subcontractors and the quality of materials and components used in production. Evaluation of the production chain, focusing on the quality and technological advancement of machines and tools used. Assessment of welding methods for accuracy, safety, and prevention of deformation. Evaluation of surface treatment and cleaning processes, with preference for those ensuring vacuum compatibility. Clear methodology for achieving and guaranteeing specified manufacturing tolerances. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Punkte, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 13,75
5.1.15.
Techniken
Rahmenvereinbarung:
Keine Rahmenvereinbarung
Informationen über das dynamische Beschaffungssystem:
Kein dynamisches Beschaffungssystem
Elektronische Auktion: nein
5.1.16.
Weitere Informationen, Schlichtung und Nachprüfung
Überprüfungsstelle: Vergabekammer des Bundes
Informationen über die Überprüfungsfristen: The competent reviewing authority is Vergabekammer des Bundes [transl.: Federal Public Procurement Tribunal] Villemombler Straße 76 53123 Bonn Tel.: 0228 9499-0 Fax: 0228 9499-163 Email: vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de Website: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html Candidate/ Bidder is requested to clearly identify those sections of the tender that contain a trade or business secret. If Bidder fails to do so, the Public Procurement Tribunal may, in the case of a review procedure, assume that Bidder has agreed to have these documents inspected (§165 para. 3 GWB). As Awarding Authority, FAIR is obliged to make the tender file available to the Public Procurement Tribunal immedi-ately when initiating a review procedure (§ 163 para. 2 cl. 3 GWB). Candidates/ Bidders have a right to expect the contracting authority's compliance with the Bidder-protecting provisions re: the tender procedure (§ 97 para. 6 GWB). If Candidate/ Bidder interested in the contract considers that Bidder's rights have been infringed through failure to comply with award regulations, the infringement must be reported to FAIR within ten calendar days (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 no. 1 GWB). Infringements identifiable on the basis of the announcement or the award docu-ments must be asserted against FAIR within the deadline for submission of tenders specified in the announcement (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 nr. 2 - 3 GWB). If FAIR informs Candidate/ Bidder that FAIR is unwilling to redress its complaint, it is possible to file an appeal for review with the aforementioned Public Procurement Tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the notification (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 no. 4 GWB). Bidders whose tenders are not to be considered for the award will be informed prior to the award according to § 134 GWB. A contract may only be concluded 15 calen-dar days after this information has been sent by FAIR. In the case of transmission by fax or electronic means, this period shall be ten calendar days. It commences on the day after dispatch of the information by FAIR. After this period has expired, a sur-charge is possible, even if the deadline is not passed according to § 160 para. 3 GWB. An application for review would therefore have to be delivered to FAIR by the Public Procurement Tribunal before the expiry of the deadline according to § 134 GWB in order to prevent a surcharge. According to § 135 para. 1 and 2 GWB, the ineffectiveness of a commission can only be established if it has been asserted in the review procedure within 30 calendar days of the conclusion of the contract but not later than six months after the conclusion of the contract. If the contracting entity has published the award in Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union [transl.: Official Journal of the European Union], the period un-enforceability shall end 30 calendar days after announcement of the publication of the award in the Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union. Information pursuant to Art. 13 GDPR on the processing of your personal data within the scope of our business relationship is available at: www.gsi.de/data-protection
Organisation, die zusätzliche Informationen über das Vergabeverfahren bereitstellt: FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH
Organisation, die weitere Informationen für die Nachprüfungsverfahren bereitstellt: Vergabekammer des Bundes
TED eSender: Datenservice Öffentlicher Einkauf (in Verantwortung des Beschaffungsamts des BMI)