81292123-Third-party monitoring in the Liptako-Gourma Region (Burkina Faso, Niger and Mali) Referenznummer der Bekanntmachung: 81292123
Bekanntmachung vergebener Aufträge
Ergebnisse des Vergabeverfahrens
Dienstleistungen
Abschnitt I: Öffentlicher Auftraggeber
Postanschrift: Dag-Hammarskjöld-Weg 1 - 5
Ort: Eschborn
NUTS-Code: DE71A Main-Taunus-Kreis
Postleitzahl: 65760
Land: Deutschland
E-Mail:
Telefon: +49 619679
Fax: +49 61967980
Internet-Adresse(n):
Hauptadresse: https://www.giz.de
Abschnitt II: Gegenstand
81292123-Third-party monitoring in the Liptako-Gourma Region (Burkina Faso, Niger and Mali)
Since 2015, the Liptako-Gourma region comprising of the border triangle of Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger, has increasingly become the epicenter of the escalating violence in the wider Sahel. In Burkina Faso alone, more than one million people have been displaced from their homes due to the complex compound of political grievances, competition over natural resources, organized crime, inter and intra-communal conflicts and a growing influence of jihadi ideology and de facto control over territory by non-state actors. Years of national and international efforts to curb the underlying factors such as poverty, historical marginalization of the peripheries, and the exacerbating effects of climate change, have been undermined and access to the most vulnerable populations for humanitarian actors have grown increasingly difficult. Additionally, national security actors have repeatedly accused humanitarian actors of supporting terrorists, while human rights organizations have blamed security actors of indiscriminate killing of civilians.
With regard to the situation described above, the Federal Foreign Office (FFO) has strengthened its stabilization engagement in the Liptako-Gourma region in recent years through a variety of instruments. In particular, the stabilization facility by UNDP, launched in 2021, in close cooperation with the Liptako-Gourma Authority (LGA) is a promising tool for bringing together key players from important political, security and social fields on the ground. However, due to the tense security situation, the presence as well as on-site visits of FFO staff or staff of implementing organizations in project regions is often not possible.
Therefore, the overall objective of the consultancy is to provide a monitoring system on socio economic situation as well as conflict trends with a geographical focus on (but not exclusively limited to) (1) Burkina Faso, Sahel region and (2) Niger, Tahoua and Tillaberi regions as well as border adjacent communities in Mali that allows FFO to:
1) Better manage/ monitor the implementation of its projects.
2) Identify relevant conflict dynamics and risks at an early stage in order to take appropriate action.
The monitoring of dynamics relevant to foreign policy is not a standard TPM service that is limited, for example, to the review of aid deliveries or individual project activities. Rather, the focus is on monitoring factors to provide for nuanced answers on FFO questions. This means that TPM data, surveys, and reports must be focused on the needs and issues of the FFO, not on individual projects. This type of monitoring or reporting requires a strong expertise and ability to critically evaluate, analyze, and prepare data in a way that can be used for operational decision making in FFO project work.
00000 Burkina Faso/Niger/Mali
In recent years, the Federal Foreign Office (FFO) has strengthened its stabilization engagement in the Liptako-Gourma region through a variety of instruments. In particular, the stabilization facility by UNDP, launched in 2021, in close cooperation with the Liptako-Gourma Authority (LGA) is a promising tool for bringing together key players from important political, security and social fields on the ground. Due to the tense security situation, the presence as well as on-site visits of FFO staff or staff of implementing organizations in project regions is often not possible.
Therefore, the overall objective of the consultancy is to provide a monitoring system on socio economic situation as well as conflict trends in Liptako-Gourma, with a geographical focus on (but not exclusively limited to) (1) Burkina Faso, Sahel region and (2) Niger, Tahoua and Tillabéri regions as well as border adjacent communities in Mali.
The following deliverables and analyses are expected for all the above-mentioned regions:
- Community perception surveys of the general security situation for the above-mentioned areas under review. Two surveys per calendar year are envisaged. The questions to be investigated relate to community perceptions of the overall security situation, the presence and behavior of various actors, influence/ control over the population, access to goods and services, international interventions, and perceptions of political participation.
- Monthly status report and availability for follow-up discussions for up to six locations/communities where activities are implemented, planned, or considered. The questions to be investigated relate to government security control, status of local administration, space for civil society. The locations to be monitored may change every month.
- Up to four of the reports listed below are required in total per month. However, these may vary in composition and may differ from month to month, according to FFO requirements.
o Up to two conflict trends analysis on developments related to violent extremist organizations in the regions, focusing on JNIM and ISSP and their respective affiliates or other VEO in the regions as per result of monthly discussions between contractor and authority.
o Up to two delivery reports from Burkina Faso/ Niger /Mali border crossings to destination concerning the observation of movement of people and goods (e.g., payment of fees or bribes or seizure of goods).
o Up to two sector-specific reports (e.g., Education, Health, Trade, Goods, etc.) on degree of ISSP/JNIM-influence/control/benefit.
o Up to one media round-up for each region of project implementation (Burkina Faso, Niger, and the border-region with Mali)
o Other specific reports as required by the authority to be discussed with contractor such as for e.g., a Network Analysis/ Actors Mapping
- Pro-active ad-hoc briefings/ reports and availability to discuss via video conference developments significant for project implementation (such as large-scale military operations, fundamental power shifts or important developments in monitored locations).
- In case of need and in line with the service provider's capabilities, deliverables mentioned above can be substituted with related tasks.
GIZ may optionally commission contract amendments and/or increases based on the criteria in the tender documents to the successful bidder of this tender. For details, please see the terms of reference.
Abschnitt IV: Verfahren
Abschnitt V: Auftragsvergabe
Auftragsvergabe IP Consult, Institut für Projektplanung GmbH
Postanschrift: Stuttgarter Str. 48
Ort: Stuttgart
NUTS-Code: DE11 Stuttgart
Postleitzahl: 70469
Land: Deutschland
Abschnitt VI: Weitere Angaben
Bekanntmachungs-ID: CXTRYY6Y1HC7YFR3
Postanschrift: Villemombler Straße 76
Ort: Bonn
Postleitzahl: 53123
Land: Deutschland
E-Mail:
Telefon: +49 2289499-0
Fax: +49 2289499-163
Internet-Adresse: https://www.bundeskartellamt.de
According to Article 160, Section 3 of the German Act Against Restraint of Competition (GWB), application for review is not permissible insofar as
1. the applicant has identified the claimed infringement of the procurement rules before submitting the application for review and has not submitted a complaint to the contracting authority within a period of 10 calendar days; the expiry of the period pursuant to Article 134, Section 2 remains unaffected,
2. complaints of infringements of procurement rules that are evident in the tender notice are not submitted to the contracting authority at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for the application or by the deadline for the submission of bids, specified in the tender notice.
3. complaints of infringements of procurement rules that first become evident in the tender documents are not submitted to the contracting authority at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for application or by the deadline for the submission of bids,
4. more than 15 calendar days have expired since receipt of notification from the contracting authority that it is unwilling to redress the complaint.
Sentence 1 does not apply in the case of an application to determine the invalidity of the contract in accordance with Article 135, Section 1 (2). Article 134, Section 1, Sentence 2 remains unaffected.