Öffentliche Ausschreibung Darmstadt 2024 Deutschland - Teilchenbeschleuniger - Titanium, water-cooled vacuum chambers for SFRS 2024-01-24

Deutschland - Teilchenbeschleuniger - Titanium, water-cooled vacuum chambers for SFRS

1. Beschaffer

1.1 Beschaffer

Offizielle Bezeichnung: FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH

Rechtsform des Erwerbers: Von einer zentralen Regierungsbehörde kontrolliertes öffentliches Unternehmen

Tätigkeit des öffentlichen Auftraggebers: Bildung

2. Verfahren

2.1 Verfahren

Titel: Titanium, water-cooled vacuum chambers for SFRS

Beschreibung: The first dipole stage of the super-FRS is situated in the target area and is formed by three 11-degree normal conducting (NC) dipoles. Due to the expected beam losses on the vacuum chamber walls, these dipoles must be able to withstand intense beam pulses. Intense beams scrape against the chamber wall at steep angles. Therefore, the chamber wall should be made of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V (3.7165) and water-cooled. A power of up to 2.4 kW with very localised energy deposition must be expected. In one single pulse energy densities up to 1 kJ/g can be reached. Because of its particular horn shape in the horizontal plane, the chamber's open aperture is defined by a rectangular profile with a constant vertical opening and a varying horizontal opening. The support structure, which holds the chamber in place, is also part of the delivery. Vacuum interfaces between the vacuum chamber and neighbouring systems are provided via special "pillow seals" that operate at 1.5 to 2 bar above atmospheric pressure. A pillow seal exerts a large pushing force of up to 64.5 kN at the wide end and 39 kN at the narrow end. Support structure design shall consider the forces exerted on the vacuum chambers by the pillow seals. The chamber and the support structure shall be able to withstand these forces. There are two types of chambers defined as type 1 long and and type 2 which are differed by their length. Type 1 is 3200 mm long and a horizontal aperture minimum of 1122 mm at the wide end. Type 2 is 3650 mm long and horizontal aperture minimum of 1200 mm at the wide end. Both types has a vertical aperture minimum of 140 mm and 500 mm of horizontal aperture minimum at their narrow end. Contractor shall deliver one type 1 chamber and two type 2 chambers and the associated support structure.

Kennung des Verfahrens: d2741465-3527-44db-860e-88d36f718e20

Interne Kennung: 35/2600005130FAIR

Verfahrensart: Verhandlungsverfahren mit vorheriger Veröffentlichung eines Aufrufs zum Wettbewerb/Verhandlungsverfahren

2.1.1 Zweck

Art des Auftrags: Lieferungen

Haupteinstufung (cpv): 31643000 Teilchenbeschleuniger

2.1.2 Erfüllungsort

Postanschrift: FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH Planckstr. 1

Stadt: Darmstadt

Postleitzahl: 64291

Land, Gliederung (NUTS): Darmstadt, Kreisfreie Stadt (DE711)

Land: Deutschland

Ort im betreffenden Land

2.1.4 Allgemeine Informationen

Zusätzliche Informationen: Bekanntmachungs-ID: CXP4YY4H5YH

Rechtsgrundlage:

Richtlinie 2014/24/EU

vgv -

5. Los

5.1 Los: LOT-0001

Titel: Titanium, water-cooled vacuum chambers for SFRS

Beschreibung: 3 titanium, water-cooled vacuum chambers; 2x long and 1x short

Interne Kennung: 35/2600005130FAIR

5.1.1 Zweck

Art des Auftrags: Lieferungen

Haupteinstufung (cpv): 31643000 Teilchenbeschleuniger

5.1.2 Erfüllungsort

Postanschrift: FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH Planckstr. 1

Stadt: Darmstadt

Postleitzahl: 64291

Land, Gliederung (NUTS): Darmstadt, Kreisfreie Stadt (DE711)

Land: Deutschland

Ort im betreffenden Land

Zusätzliche Informationen:

5.1.6 Allgemeine Informationen

Auftragsvergabeprojekt nicht aus EU-Mitteln finanziert

Die Beschaffung fällt unter das Übereinkommen über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen

5.1.7 Strategische Auftragsvergabe

Ziel der strategischen Auftragsvergabe: Keine strategische Beschaffung

5.1.10 Zuschlagskriterien

Kriterium:

Art: Preis

Bezeichnung: Preis

Gewichtung (Punkte, genau): 50

Kriterium:

Art: Qualität

Bezeichnung: Production: Description of all production steps ensuring compliance with all technical previcion specifications and quality features

Beschreibung: - A detailed description of all necessary production and manufacturing processes is expected, including details of the technical equipment. It should be comprehensible how the fulfillment of the specifications is achieved and how the end product is manufactured, assembled and tested in compliance with all conditions, technical precision requirements and quality features. - Include a description of the project planning with resource planning and estimated coordination efforts, as well as a statement on the availability of the required material and components, statements on subcontractors, statements on the quality of the material and components. - It is evaluated whether the description shows a high-quality, state-of-the-art production chain, in particular which machines/tools are to be used. - Welding methods for better accuracy, safety, or avoiding deformation during welding are rated. - Surface treatment and cleaning can have different levels. A safe achievement of the vacuum goals is rated as positive. - The procedure for achieving the specified manufacturing tolerances should be described and a safe method for guaranteeing the goals is evaluated positive. - Simple and flexible solutions to achieve the specifications are evaluated positively. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria

Gewichtung (Punkte, genau): 17.5

Kriterium:

Art: Qualität

Bezeichnung: Quality Insurance and test methods, quality of communication and documentation

Beschreibung: - Description of the specified acceptance tests (visual, mechanical, vacuum, water-cooling). It is evaluated how much the tests will ensure the design goals. - Precise explanation of the concrete approach and integration of quality assurance in all acceptance tests. It is evaluated how the organisation and documentation tests will ensure the design goals. - Relevant certificates for critical production steps, like welding, and the standards these works are to be carried out. Often these standards have different levels. - Standard compliant QA documentation; Risk assessment for hazards, declaration of incorporation. It should be shown that the Contractor can deliver the demanded documentation. - Logical and transparent description of the offer in itself. An unclear scope poses a project risk. - Possibly an investigation of project risks, which may lead to delays or non fulfilment of goals. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria

Gewichtung (Punkte, genau): 7.5

Kriterium:

Art: Qualität

Bezeichnung: Adherence to the time schedule and transport concept

Beschreibung: - Detailing how to ensure the targeted production schedule and delivery schedule. A binding commitment to comply with the delivery schedule is assessed positively. - Presentation of the provider's approach to any delays in delivery or service caused by subcontractors. - Method of transport, especially in agreement with the specifications. Risk during transport can be minimized and safe intermediate storage be ensured 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria

Gewichtung (Punkte, genau): 7.5

Kriterium:

Art: Qualität

Bezeichnung: Detailing of the design concept

Beschreibung: - A comprehensible, logical presentation and description of the design concept is asked for. People should be dedicated to the project. - The quality of the planned simulations and simulation methodology is rated. - The possibility to include alternatives to the given preliminary design in case of technical problems is rated positive. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria

Gewichtung (Punkte, genau): 17.5

5.1.12 Bedingungen für die Auftragsvergabe

Informationen über die Überprüfungsfristen: The competent investigating authority is as follows Vergabekammer des Bundes Villemombler Str. 76 D-53123 Bonn, Germany Tel.: 0228 9499-0 Fax: 0228 9499-163 Email: vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de Web: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html The applicant is requested to clearly identify those parts of the request to participate (and any subsequent bid) containing company/business secrets. If this does not happen, the public procurement tribunal will assume consent to inspect the documents as required in the case of carrying out a review procedure (Section 165 (3) Act against Restraints of Competition (Competition Act - GWB)). As the awarding authority, FAIR is required to provide the public procurement tribunal with immediate access to the files when a review procedure is initiated (Section 163 (2) sentence 3 GWB). Applicants/bidders have the right to demand that the Contracting authority comply with the provisions on the award procedure protecting bidders (Section 97 (6) GWB). Applicants/bidders with an interest in the public contract who believe their rights have been violated by non-compliance with the provisions governing the awarding of public contracts, must raise an objection about the violation to FAIR within ten calendar days (Section 160 (3) sentence 1 no. 1 GWB). Violations known from the tender notice or tender documents must be claimed vis-a-vis FAIR before the time limit given for submission of applications (offers) (Section 160 (3) 1 No. 2 - 3 GWB). If FAIR informs the applicant/bidder that it is unwilling to redress the objection, an application for review may then be filed with the public procurement tribunal above within 15 days of receipt of the notification (Section 160 (3) sentence 1 no. 4 GWB). Bidders whose bids are not to be considered for the award of the contract will be notified before the awarding of the contract pursuant to Section 134 GWB. A contract may only be concluded 15 calendar days after FAIR has sent out this information. This period is ten calendar days when transmission is by fax or email. The period commences on the day following the dispatch of the information by FAIR. After this time period has expired, an award is possible even if a time limit pursuant to Section 160 (3) GWB has yet to expire. Therefore, in order to prevent an award, a request for review needs to have been served upon FAIR by the public procurement tribunal before the expiry of the time limit under Section 134 GWB. Pursuant to Section 135 (1) and (2) GWB, the invalidity of an award can only be established if it has been asserted in the review procedure within 30 calendar days from the date on which there was notification on the conclusion of the agreement, though no later than six months after the agreement was concluded. If the Contracting authority published the tender notice in the Official Journal of the European Union, the time limit for claiming ineffectiveness shall expire 30 calendar days after the publication of the tender notice in the Official Journal of the European Union.

5.1.15 Techniken

Rahmenvereinbarung:

Keine Rahmenvereinbarung

Informationen über das dynamische Beschaffungssystem

Kein dynamisches Beschaffungssystem

Elektronische Auktion:

5.1.16 Weitere Informationen, Schlichtung und Nachprüfung

Überprüfungsstelle: Vergabekammer des Bundes

Organisation, die zusätzliche Informationen über das Vergabeverfahren bereitstellt: FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH

6. Ergebnisse

Wert aller im Rahmen dieses Verfahrens vergebenen Aufträge: 1,392,044 EUR

6.1 Ergebnis, Los-– Kennung: LOT-0001

Es wurde mindestens ein Gewinner ermittelt.

6.1.2 Informationen über die Gewinner

Wettbewerbsgewinner:

Offizielle Bezeichnung: CNIM Systemes Industriels

Angebot:

Kennung des Angebots:

Kennung des Loses oder der Gruppe von Losen: LOT-0001

Informationen zum Auftrag:

Kennung des Auftrags:

Titel: Titanium, water-cooled vacuum chambers for SFRS

Datum des Vertragsabschlusses: 2023-11-19+01:00

Der Auftrag wird als Teil einer Rahmenvereinbarung vergeben: false

6.1.4 Statistische Informationen

Eingegangene Angebote oder Teilnahmeanträge:

Art der eingegangenen Einreichungen: Angebote

Anzahl der eingegangenen Angebote oder Teilnahmeanträge: 4

Art der eingegangenen Einreichungen: Angebote auf elektronischem Wege eingereicht

Anzahl der eingegangenen Angebote oder Teilnahmeanträge: 4

Art der eingegangenen Einreichungen: Teilnahmeanträge

Anzahl der eingegangenen Angebote oder Teilnahmeanträge: 5

Art der eingegangenen Einreichungen: Angebote von Kleinst-, kleinen oder mittleren Unternehmen

Anzahl der eingegangenen Angebote oder Teilnahmeanträge: 3

Art der eingegangenen Einreichungen: Angebote von mittleren Unternehmen

Anzahl der eingegangenen Angebote oder Teilnahmeanträge: 3

Art der eingegangenen Einreichungen: Angebote von kleinen Unternehmen